Staff Selection Commission

(Revised Result) Recruitment of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF and SSB, Examination, 2011 (Implementation of Court Order)

Final result of Recruitment of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF and SSB, Examination, 2011 was declared on 18.11.2011 for 872 successful Female and on 28.11.2011 for 44,152 successful Male candidates. Revised result of 1881 candidates was declared on 6.7.2012 and 194 candidates on 16.3.2012.

2. Result of 6657 RME ‘FIT’ candidates (6572 male and 85 female candidates) was declared on 31.7.2012 under Reserve List-2. In pursuance of Delhi High Court order in WP(C) No. 6961/2012 on 5.11.2012, WP(C) No. 6911/2012 on 7-11-2012 and WP(C) No. 7651/2012 on 14.12.2012, Commission revised the result of RME ‘FIT’ candidates and a single Select List and Reserve List has been prepared. Total number of candidates qualifyingin single Select List and Reserve List were as under:-

Male – Select List - 48132, Reserve List - 8574
Female- Select List – 930, Reserve List-115

The list of additional 12414 male candidates (10433 in SL +1981 in RL) and 183 female candidates (159 in SL + 23 in RL) selected was declared on 1.8.2013.

4. Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in order dated 6.5.2014 in the WP (C) No. 5663/2013 (Deepak Kumar Singh and Others) v/s UOI and Another and similar petitions had, inter-alia, directed that “petitions have been found fit for appointment merit wise as well as medically,and the only ground on which they are not being appointed is that in Column 17 of their application forms they have not indicated their preference and/or have left the said column blank, we are of the view that as one time measure the Respondents may consider appointing the Petitioner before this Court, in the order of their inter-se merit, the name of the petitioner to be placed at the bottom of the “select list” as well as “reserve list”. This shall, however, be subject to the Petitioner furnishing unconditional undertaking that he/she shall not claim any right to seniority and/or any consequential benefits qua those who are placed in the “select list” and “reserve list””. Hon’ble High Court in its final order dated 14.7.2014 in the above W.P. reiterated its directions in earlier order dated 6.5.2014. In pursuance of the Hon’ble High Court order, 40 candidates submitted the undertaking and their result was revised by replacing Default preferences (ABCD).

5. Subsequently, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in order dated 21.11.2014 in WP (C) No. 8004 of 2014 (Navrattan Singh and Others) v/s UOI and Another has, inter-alia, directed that “this Court disposed off a batch of the said Writ Petitions making a note that the grievance of these petitioners who were being denied appointment only because of the fact that they had left column No.17 blank or had not properly recorded their preference in the said form in terms of the order dated 16th May 2014, although they were higher in merit stands redressed. …….We thus, allow the present writ petition filed by the petitioners and the respondents are
directed to consider the case of the petitioners for inclusion of their names in the select list and subject to their fulfilling all other eligibility conditions……”

6. In compliance of the Hon’ble Court order, following number of male candidates have qualified in the Revised Result :-

Preference: (BSF: A, CISF: B, CRPF: C, SSB: D)

Click Here for Official Notification

Click Here for Revised Result List- I

Click Here for Revised Result List- II

Courtesy: SSC